|

About
the Centre

Programs
We Offer
  
Deaf-Blind
Info
 
Links
& Contacts

How you
can help

Our
Sponsors

Back
to
Media/Press

Picture Gallery

In
Helen's Words
|
|
Canadian Helen Keller Centre
|
Sign Language Ruling Hailed as Key Victory
"Deaf
with illnesses can have province paid interpreters," court
rules
by David
Vienneau, Ottawa Editor
OTTAWA
-
In
what is being hailed as a major victory for disabled people,
the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that provinces must pay for
sign language interpreters for the deaf when they receive medical
treatment.
Advocates for the deaf and other disabled groups said the judgement
recognizes that the deaf have the same right to communicate
with their doctors as people who can hear. They said the decision
would serve as a powerful lever for all disabled people in their
struggle for equal treatment.
The court, in a 9-0 judgement, said the B.C. government's failure
to pay for sign language interpreters at a cost of $150,000.00
a year infringed the equality rights section of the Charter
of Rights and Freedoms.
Section 15 of the Charter says everyone is equal under the law
regardless of whether they have a handicap.
"Effective communication is an indispensable component of the
delivery of medical services," Mr Justice Gérad La Forest wrote
in a decision released yesterday.
"The absence of a publicly funded sign language interpretation
service discriminated against deaf people by denying them the
equal benefit of the B.C. health care system."
Although the case arose in British Columbia, the ruling has
national implications because it sends a signal to every province
that sign language interpreters must be made available at public
expense. B.C. has six months to comply with the decision.
"We are thrilled with this decision," Gary Malkowski of the
Canadian Hearing Society told reporters through a sign language
interpreter. "It is the best scenario we possibly could have
gotten."
"We have finally recognized that the deaf have access to health
care on an equal basis," said Malkowski, a former Ontario MPP.
Michael Huck of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities predicted
the decision will result in improved access to public services,
education and training programs.
"This decision is about inclusion, inclusion for all Canadians
including those with disabilities," he told reporters.
There are limited interpreting services for health care in Ontario.
But a doctor or hospital must request the service and pay between
$30 and $40 an hour for it.
Toronto lawyer David Baker of the Advocacy Resource Centre for
the Handicapped said only about 40 per cent of hospitals have
allocated funding for this purpose.
"It is subject to some hospitals paying for the service and
many hospitals are declining," Baker, one of the lawyers who
argued the case, said in an interview. "Interpreters are present
in only about 10 or 15 per cent of the circumstances where they
should be."
La Forest, who recently announced his retirement, made a strong
plea for recognizing the rights of all disabled persons whom
he said have long been targets of discrimination.
"People with disabilities have too often been excluded from
the labour force, denied access to opportunities for social
interaction and advancement, subjected to invidious stereotyping
and relegated to institutions", he wrote.
"This historical disadvantage has to a great extent been shaped
and perpetuated by the notion that disability is an abnormality
or flaw. As a result, disabled persons have not generally been
afforded the equal, concern, respect and consideration" that
the Charter demands, he wrote.
"Instead, they have been subjected to paternalistic attitudes
of pity and charity, and their entrance into the social mainstream
has been conditional upon their emulation of able-bodied norms."
The court challenge was brought by three people, including John
and Linda Warren. Their twin daughters were born prematurely
and after some difficulty, but there was no sign interpreter
in the delivery room to explain what was happening.
At the October, 1992, trial, Linda Warren's doctor testified
that communicating in writing was time-consuming, impractical
and had the potential to result in harm, especially during a
difficult childbirth.
The Canadian Hearing Society estimates that more than 200,600
people in Canada, including about 72,200 in Ontario, are completely
deaf or have severe hearing problems.
|
|
|
|